<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SECURE VOTING</title>
	<link>http://www.mikecritelli.com/2008/01/08/secure-voting/</link>
	<description>Mike Critelli's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mikecritelli.com/2008/01/08/secure-voting/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikecritelli.com/2008/01/08/secure-voting/#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Bob,

This is a secure anonymous system.  The ballots are automatically inserted, and then returned and scanned automatically while they are in a sealed envelope.  The elections official would intervene to validate signatures (without getting access to how the citizen voted) for the limited purpose of validating signatures.  Obviously, one could envision a situation in which a legally-mandated recount would require a more specific vote-by-vote examination.

- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>This is a secure anonymous system.  The ballots are automatically inserted, and then returned and scanned automatically while they are in a sealed envelope.  The elections official would intervene to validate signatures (without getting access to how the citizen voted) for the limited purpose of validating signatures.  Obviously, one could envision a situation in which a legally-mandated recount would require a more specific vote-by-vote examination.</p>
<p>- Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kiggins</title>
		<link>http://www.mikecritelli.com/2008/01/08/secure-voting/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mikecritelli.com/2008/01/08/secure-voting/#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I empathize totally having often been personally skewered on the "bleeding edge" of tech - albeit not with dire consequences to the body politic or, I would think, society at large.

One question: with your system how is voter anonymity preserved? I suppose there is a good answer as I think "write in" ballots are not new.

P.S. I admit to not having done my "homework" on your product.

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I empathize totally having often been personally skewered on the &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; of tech - albeit not with dire consequences to the body politic or, I would think, society at large.</p>
<p>One question: with your system how is voter anonymity preserved? I suppose there is a good answer as I think &#8220;write in&#8221; ballots are not new.</p>
<p>P.S. I admit to not having done my &#8220;homework&#8221; on your product.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
